EPPI-Reviewer: systematic review software. EPPI-Centre. Accessed February 24, 2026. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2914
Munthe-Kaas H, Nøkleby H, Lewin S, Glenton C. The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0834-5
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647
International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). Published 2016.
Criteria for Cochrane RRs. Cochrane Rapid Reviews. Accessed February 16, 2026. https://methods.cochrane.org/rapidreviews/rr-methods-guidance/criteria-cochrane-rrs
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al; ROBIS Steering Group. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:225-234. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
Garrard J. Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method. 5th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017.
Alvesson M, Sandberg J. Generating research questions through problematization. Acad Manage Rev. 2011;36(2):247-271.
Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, McKoy NA. Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1325-1330. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.009
Sheridan S, Schrandt S, Forsythe L, Hilliard TS, Paez KA; PCORI Engagement Rubric Workgroup. The PCORI Engagement Rubric: promising practices for partnering in research. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(2):165-170. doi:10.1370/afm.2042
Brooke BS, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. MOOSE reporting guidelines for meta-analyses of observational studies. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(8):787-788. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0522
GRADE handbook. Cochrane Training. Accessed February 15, 2026. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/grade-approach
Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Accessed February 15, 2026. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
Open Science Framework. Center for Open Science. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://osf.io/
Retraction Watch Database. Center for Scientific Integrity. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://retractiondatabase.org/
ISSG Search Filters Resource. InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home
NISO CRediT Working Group. CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy. National Information Standards Organization; 2022. doi:10.3789/ansi.niso.z39.104-2022
Wohlin C. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM; 2014:1-10. doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268
Sterne J, Higgins J, Elbers R, Reeves B. ROBINS-I crib sheet. Google Docs. Published November 20, 2025. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tXCLVa7aFVaiV3OnitZDgAnX3kXWXor0/view
Johnson EE, O’Keefe H, Sutton A, Marshall C. The Systematic Review Toolbox: keeping up to date with tools to support evidence synthesis. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):258. doi:10.1186/s13643-022-02122-z
Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(3):240-243. doi:10.5195/jmla.2016.24
Leslie S. Grey matters checklist. Emory Libraries Research Guides. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://guides.libraries.emory.edu/grey_literature/grey_matters_checklist
Reporting guidelines. EQUATOR Network. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/
Risk of bias tools - RoB 2 tool. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/rob-2-0-tool
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al; PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890. doi:10.1136/bmj.l6890
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-46. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
Christiansen S, Iverson C, Flanagin A, et al. AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. 11th ed. Oxford University Press; 2020.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2019.
COMET Initiative. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://www.comet-initiative.org/
